• Users Online: 88
  • Home
  • Print this page
  • Email this page
Home About us Editorial board Ahead of print Current issue Search Archives Submit article Instructions Subscribe Contacts Login 


 
 Table of Contents  
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Year : 2021  |  Volume : 6  |  Issue : 1  |  Page : 9-14

Trauma and spinal cord injury – A narrative review


1 Social Worker, Rehabilitation Institute, Christian Medical College, Vellore, Tamil Nadu, India
2 Department of Social Work, Independent Researcher, SreeBalaji Dental College and Hospital, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India
3 Department of Social Work, University of Tamil Nadu, Thiruvarur, Tamil Nadu, India
4 Department of Public Health Dentistry, SreeBalaji Dental College and Hospital, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India

Date of Submission06-Oct-2021
Date of Acceptance22-Oct-2021
Date of Web Publication29-Nov-2021

Correspondence Address:
Dr. Karthikeyan Pandiyambakkam Rajendran
Independent Researcher, Chennai, Tamil Nadu
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/ijosr.ijosr_4_21

Rights and Permissions
  Abstract 


An accident or traumatic injury to the spinal cord may result in a serious and irreversible spinal cord injury. Such spinal injury causes significant changes in the life of the injured person and his or her family members. Spinal cord injury can require extreme physical, locomotor, and psychological adaptation which exerts enormous pressure on the patients' families, who plays critically vital roles in providing support and care. It is a struggle for both victims and their families. Few studies have captured exactly not only the major physical injury but also the long-term consequences of spinal cord injury in the patients living with such injuries over time. Besides impacting the health, well-being and psychosocial behaviors of individual victims but also the interpersonal relationship within the family members. The objectives of the study are to identify the burdens of spinal cord injury and the challenges faced by persons with spinal cord injury in their day-to-day life in India and to know the intervention strategies to enhance the quality of life of persons with spinal cord injury. Therefore, the current study besides highlighting the issues faced by spinal cord injury patients also helps in greater understanding of the burden of spinal cord injury and its public health importance in India.

Keywords: Burden, disability, injury, public health, spinal cord injury, trauma


How to cite this article:
Rose G J, Rajendran KP, Udhayakumar P, Anita M. Trauma and spinal cord injury – A narrative review. Int J Soc Rehabil 2021;6:9-14

How to cite this URL:
Rose G J, Rajendran KP, Udhayakumar P, Anita M. Trauma and spinal cord injury – A narrative review. Int J Soc Rehabil [serial online] 2021 [cited 2022 May 21];6:9-14. Available from: https://www.ijsocialrehab.com/text.asp?2021/6/1/9/331479




  Introduction Top


The spinal cord is an extension of the brain and is comprised a large bundle of nerves. Nerves convey messages to the rest of our body from our brain. These signals help us move our body, notice pressure, and maintain vital functions such as breathing, blood pressure, bladder, and digestive system.[1] The interaction between our brain and the rest of our body is disturbed when the spinal cord is damaged, resulting in a loss of movement and sensation below the injury level. In paraplegia, the movement and feeling of your legs and probably some abdominal muscles are affected and in tetraplegia, all four limbs, stomach, and some chest muscles affect movement and feeling. Spinal cord injury (SCI) is a traumatic incident that has a greater impact on the physical, emotional, and social well-being of a patient and creates a major financial burden on health-care systems.[2] This is a plenary review and it aims to summarize available literature on the burden of SCI. The objectives of this study are to identify the burdens of SCI; to describe the varied challenges faced by SCI patients; to discuss the intervention strategies that would possibly enhance the quality of life (QOL) of persons with SCI; and to identify the stature of developing countries in understanding the public health importance of SCI.

SCIs are graded according to the American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) grading scale, which describes the severity of the injury.[3] The scale is graded with letters:

ASIA A: Complete SCI with no sensory or motor function.

ASIA B: An incomplete sensory injury with complete loss of motor control.

ASIA C: An incomplete motor injury, where there is some activity.

ASIA D: Incomplete motor injury with anti-gravity affecting more than half of the muscle groups.

The life process is an experience where the individual struggles to fulfill their needs within their limitations.[4] Achieving these daily needs at every level of life is greatly more difficult for persons with SCI. They require an intense modification in lifestyle. From having been free to engage in all activities connected with ordinary living, postinjury even simple routine tasks now become a challenge.[5] According to WHO, “Health is the complete state of complete Physical, Mental and Social Well-Being and not merely the absence of diseases or infirmity.” Unfortunately, SCI affects all dimensions of health which leads to negative life indicators. For example, suicide rates in SCI populations are four to five times higher than that of the general population.[6] Being male, depressed, engaging in alcohol and other drug abuse, and having poor family support have also been shown to be risk factors for suicide.[7] There is a need for special consideration to know about persons with SCI and their mental health, QOL, and burden in day-to-day life in India.[8]


  Methods Top


The search strategy using keywords “SCI,” “traumatic SCI,” “non-traumatic SCI,” and “Burden” was adopted to search literature published in PubMed, Medline, EMBASE, and the Web of Science. All those articles mentioning the incidence, etiology, prevalence, patient demographics, accident level and severity, complications, and psychological and social problems were examined. Only papers that were published in the English language were included and largely restricted to articles on human beings. Furthermore, meeting abstracts, case reports, and editorials were excluded from our review. Studies that were original work involving patients with SCI were included for the review independently by the authors. All the relevant articles and open-source data providing regional or national data on injury to the spinal cord were also systematically screened.

Incidence and prevalence

The global incidence of SCI is 40–80 new cases per million population every year, indicating that about 250,000–500,000 individuals suffer from SCI[5] per year. The annual incidence of SCI in different countries has been reported to vary between 11.5 and 57.8 cases per million people.[9] Unfortunately, because of the lack of accuracy in data reporting, the worldwide incidence of SCI cannot be calculated. Although no accurate prevalence rate is available worldwide,[10] in India, as per a report, 15 lakh individuals are affected by SCI, with an estimated increase of 20,000 cases every year falling from height in India seemed to be the most common mode of injury.[11] Sridharan et al. found that falls from a height that involves falls from the tree and falls into the well was the most common cause of injury in both sexes. Spinal cord damage due to falls was 63% in males and 62% in females, while damage due to a road traffic accident in males and females was only 27% and 38%, respectively. An injury happens in the cervical level segments in males. On the other hand, an injury occurring at the lumbar level segments was high in the female population.[12]

In addition, a study by Mathur et al. found that 577 patients (21.2%) had fallen from the rooftop of the rural population out of 1145 patients (42.2%) who suffered the injury after fall. After falling into a dry well while digging or inadvertently, 91 patients (3.6%) suffered spinal injuries.[13] After the collapse of a heavy object overhead, which is a typical mode of transport of goods in rural areas, 84 patients (3%) sustained trauma. This is a popular mode of carriage of goods in rural areas.[14] After the dropping of a large object over the back, two hundred 91 patients (10.7%) suffered the injury when removing mud from the dry well to increase its depth or putting or removing grain bags in the storage room. After falling from the electric pole or height after the electric shock, 110 (4%) experienced trauma.[13] In addition to SCI, electric burns were also incurred. This was an unusual trauma pattern observed in the Indian population.[15] At the same time, the main cause of SCI in developed countries was a road traffic accident, consisting of up to 58%[9] and found mainly in younger age groups.[16] Among these countries, falls are the second leading cause of SCI, with a prevalence of up to 46.6% and still found mostly in the elderly, there is a significant gap between developed and developing nations.[17]

Challenges

Early crises

The early crises were the first experiences associated with SCI. There were four subcategories in this group, as follows: denial and uncertainty, feelings of loneliness and depression, the crisis of dependence, and a drastic shift in the normal course of life.[18] Unbelief and denial of disability and loss of mobility are some of the problems of post-SCI experiences.[19] People with SCI initially have unrealistic expectations of recovery and in some places, especially the inability to walk, do not understand disabilities. Concerning the possibility of recovery and denial, other subjects were feelings of loneliness and depression during the first months after the incident.[20] Experiencing psychologically critical phases of post-SCI and experiencing loneliness, depression, and suicidal impulses.[21] During their lives, anyone can suffer from an illness and have an accident that harms them of normal activity in certain organs of the body.[22] The truth is that they would dream of committing suicide if no one helps the disabled. They would be so lonely and depressed if this idea did not originate in their minds. Hence, it is a suicide of a kind.[23]

Dependency crisis

One of the most serious crises and difficulties was excessive dependence on others in many personal and everyday activities and being a burden. SCI individuals often feel embarrassed for asking helps with personal activities, especially for bathing and toilet use. It was very difficult for them to let someone else do everyday tasks in this respect. For a person who has not seen it, it may be humorous and too normal.[24] It was really painful to make anyone else come to house to strip clothes off, to insert a catheter, and strip me to the toilet, for example, cannot bear to picture one person coming and taking to the bathroom. There will be some people coming to take to the toilet. It will be too painful.[20] A sudden shift in the normal course of life participants viewed SCI as a disaster and said that both physical and motor skills were lost at once; thus, all everyday activities underwent dramatic and substantial changes. The situation is going to get difficult unexpectedly and life stops and follows an unusual model.[25] The behavior of people, the actions of the family, their thought, the fact that before the accident you were an independent individual, you were studying, you were working, you had a different look and face and then you are sitting in a wheelchair. About a shift in all daily living habits, and considering a guy who ran for 20 years, did all the jobs, including mountain climbing, and used to swim, ride a bike.[26] You are immediately stripped of them all. Nothing cannot do anymore.[27]

Employment challenges

The loss of their employment due to decreased physical capabilities is a major challenge faced by persons with SCI.[28] Furthermore, their social engagement was limited by inadequate skills training and insufficient jobs for their situation.[29] Jobs are seen by society as a measure of efficiency, rank, esteem, and source of income concerning the lack of skill training and work support. Income meets needs such as survival, protection, and self-esteem.[30] A study by Krause et al.[31] found that a successfully re-settled spinal injured person has a positive relationship with the individual's emotional state and a smooth family and social relationship. For those who are working and active, the increased QOL of people with SCI has been shown.[32] In addition, due to their working status, they tend to be happier with their lives as they have good physical, psychological, and social well-being.[12] The employment rate for people with SCI, however, is lower than the nondisabled population in the United States, where around 35% of people with SCI are working.[33] All the physiological problems linked to SCI are supposed to be tackled and effectively with a great deal of confidence.[34]

Lack of barrier-free environments

The absence of barrier-free facilities in highways, passages, urban furniture, etc., stopped them from leaving their homes and reducing social participation.[35] Regarding the inaccessibility of public places and places of work, if a person with a disability wants to go to university, for example, but lacks barrier-free infrastructure.[36] There are stairs at another university and no ramps. Well, you have to leave your studies when you see there is no barrier-free university. The government office itself is also disabled and has no ramps when you want to go to the government bureau. In the barrier-free area, not just in colleges, all public service locations are missing.[37]

Transportation challenges

Among the problems at the time of entering society was the lack of barrier-free cars and public transport, the need for taxis to help wheelchair users, and, subsequently, the high cost of transport. Since all disabled people do not have a personal vehicle, it is very difficult to go anywhere. They haveve got a taxi to hire. Taxis also do not accept them because wheelchairs remain half-open so that their trunks remain half-open, and most of them do not accept them. This wheelchair occupies a lot of space because of it., they hesitate so much and charge a lot of money for those who accept.[14]

Mental health issues

A discussion about whether individuals with SCI suffer depression since the onset of SCI has continued for decades.[38] The Spinal Cord Medicine Group (1998) indicated that depression is not a single entity since it requires many potential diagnoses. They also found that when they are in the acute or treatment stages, individuals with SCI may not have faced the full extent of the changes placed on them due to SCI. Therefore, when returning home (or later in life), they may be more vulnerable to depression because of a decline in social and medical support and the burden of pain.[39] The Spinal Cord Medicine Group (1998)[9] explained that dealing with SCI may include types of grief (e.g., sorrow, feelings of loss, nostalgia) and that these reactions must be separated from the more extreme and common depressive reactions (e.g., helplessness, hopelessness, feeling useless, excessive remorse or self-reproach, suicidal thoughts). Several factors may increase depression (e.g., decreased physical functioning, inaccessible environment, lack of social support, lack of a reason or job) as well as the risk of suicide after SCI[40] The mean ages of people with SCI and caregivers were 34.8 (11.0) and 33.6 (12.3) years, respectively, studied by Shambu P et al.[9] Most of the TSCI participants were male (67.4%) and had paraplegia (73.7%). The caregivers were predominantly female (61.1%). In 68% of those with SCI, the depressed mood was seen and 91.6% of caregivers reported the burden. The depressed mood has been significantly linked to gender, education, a form of injury, and duration of the injury.[41] The burden of the caregiver was related to the profession, education, injury degree, duration of treatment, and depressed mood level of the person with SCI. The economic burden was found to be the largest (71.5%), followed by responsibility (22.2%) and time-related burden (6.3%). Among people with SCI, the incidence of depressed mood, and the strain of caregiving in caregivers were high. Depressed mood was correlated with caregiver burden in those with SCI.[42]

Spiritual

Spirituality is one resource that individuals use to coping with a massive life change such as having a SCI. Even though spirituality means different meanings to different people, after experiencing a SCI, people with stronger spiritual beliefs appear to be happier and less depressed and indicate that religion and spirituality may play a major role in the rehabilitation process following SCI.[43] Many people facing a chronic illness or permanent disability can ask the question, “Why?”[44] Pargament (1997) has indicated that certain answers to this question could be given by religious faith. “For example, suffering may be viewed as a spiritual opportunity, the consequence of human sinfulness, the effect of a past existence now influencing this one, a means of finding redemption or approval, the intervention of a God who punishes the devil, or vice versa. Instead, religious faith can lead one to the understanding that misery “has nothing to do with you” but is part of the human being's natural course.[45] The relationship between spiritual well-being and health-related QOL among patients with SCI was examined by Migliorini C, et al., with 213 patients, and found that the mean age of patients was 43.5 (SD = 10.8) years, with the majority being male (77.5%).[45] Religious well-being and existential well-being were important factors contributing to enhanced vitality, social functioning, mental well-being, and emotional role, the outcomes of regression analysis The findings indicate that in people with SCI, having higher levels of spiritual well-being might enhance the QOL.[46]

Acute care

A very crucial step in the care of accident victims is the management of acute SCI at the site of injury. Immediate therapy can lessen long-term effects; appropriate therapy typically involves medication and rehabilitation therapy. As part of the treatment of all patients with acute SCI, the following procedures should be incorporated. The significance of recognition and early treatment, such as usage of the cervical collar or spinal board, is adequate first aid. Proper transport strategies were used to carry the patient to the emergency center. The time needed to transport patients from the site of the accident to the treatment centers and the delay in reaching the treatment centers. Surgery Timing.[44] Financial burden and efforts to resolve this burden and the logistics involved in transportation, preparation, and execution are involved. For the prevention of secondary SCI, early care of patients with acute SCI is very important. One hundred and thirty-three patients with acute SCI were examined in a study performed by Prasad et al. from NIMS, Hyderabad. Data obtained from the study showed that only 7 (5.2%) of the total number of patients entered the hospital within 8 h and another 23% of patients arrived within 24 h. Patients reached 42% between 24 and 72 h. Ramani and Laud from Mumbai had also reported similar results for the time taken by patients with SCI to reach the hospital. Reports collected from the USA, and on the other hand, showed that almost 50.2% of patients were admitted within 1 h of the accident. Data obtained from a study conducted at MIOT Hospitals, Chennai, between April 2005 and March 2007, showed that only 4 (4.9%) of 81 patients with SCI were admitted within less than 8 h. Two of these patients sustained an injury at a place 3–4 km from the hospital, indicating that only if they were inside the hospital area can only get the timely care.[47]


  Discussion Top


In India, the most common factors hindering management during a hospital stay are financial constraints and patients not reaching the final institution, and lack of adequate facilities at the definitive institution, psychological factors, illiteracy, and insufficient patient education are other factors hindering hospitalization.[22] Factors that prevent integration into the mainstream society are insufficient recovery, a barrier-ridden climate, challenges in accessing government/other agencies' assistance, poor society knowledge, financial obstacles, lack of assistive technology availability, and unrealistic beliefs. In the context of spinal injuries, things are bound to improve and the government will play a major role through community awareness and preventive initiatives, and promotion of education and science.[5] We have come to the beginning of the end. It is time to start consolidating our winnings and taking the message to our community that the patient with SCI dramatizes this danger with a paradox, requiring a lot of highly specialized treatment, but his overall treatment remains of primary importance.[48] Things are bound to change in the case of spinal injuries and the government will play a major role through community awareness and preventive measures, and promotion of education and science.[5]

Way forward

We have entered the end of an era. It is time to start consolidating our winnings and take the message to our community that the patient with SCI dramatizes this disaster with a paradox, requiring a lot of highly specialized treatment, but his general treatment remains of primary importance.

Recommendation

  • Mental health aspects should be given importance in persons with neurodisability conditions
  • All district hospitals should be equipped with specially trained rehabilitation professionals
  • The intensity and severity of the problem have to be taken into account whenever new schemes are formed
  • Strict regulation should be followed inaccessibility in all public utility places
  • Public transportation should be accessible for wheelchair users.



  Conclusion Top


SCI creates physical, psychosocial, emotional, and economic problems that affect not only the injured person but also the family.[49] These issues can lead to life dissatisfaction and thus decrease the QOL of both patients and caregivers. All aspects of care in all groups, except the elite tier, were affected by financial constraints.[50] Therefore, a very large percentage of the Indian population is projected to find it very hard to access SCI management and community integration expenses. A better understanding of the types of symptoms experienced by individuals with SCI and their frequency, severity, levels, and impacts on day-to-day functioning is a significant step in recognizing comprehensive information and understanding the burden of SCI and its complication in patient's perception to address their needs in the holistic approach.[51]

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.



 
  References Top

1.
Jensen MP, Kuehn CM, Amtmann D, Cardenas DD. Symptom burden in persons with spinal cord injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2007;88:638-45.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
Simpson LA, Eng JJ, Hsieh JT, Wolfe DL; Spinal Cord Injury Rehabilitation Evidence Scire Research Team. The health and life priorities of individuals with spinal cord injury: A systematic review. J Neurotrauma 2012;29:1548-55.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
Kirshblum C, Groah SL, McKinley WO, Gittler MS, Stiens SA. Spinal cord injury medicine. 1. Etiology, classification, and acute medical management. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2002;83 3 Suppl 1:8.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.
Starck PL. Maslow's needs and the spinal cord injured client. Rehabil Nurs 1980;5:17-20.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.
World Health Organization, International Spinal Cord Society, editors. International Perspectives on Spinal Cord Injury. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 2013. p. 231.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.
De Vivo MJ, Krause JS, Lammertse DP. Recent trends in mortality and causes of death among persons with spinal cord injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1999;80:1411-9.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.
Judd FK, Brown DJ. Psychiatric consultation in a spinal injuries unit. Aust N Z J Psychiatry 1992;26:218-22.  Back to cited text no. 7
    
8.
Chhabra, H., Sharma, S. & Arora, M. Challenges in comprehensive management of spinal cord injury in India and in the Asian Spinal Cord network region: findings of a survey of experts, patients and consumers. Spinal Cord 2018;56:71-7.  Back to cited text no. 8
    
9.
James SL, Theadom A, Ellenbogen RG, Bannick MS, Montjoy-Venning W, Lucchesi LR, et al. Global, regional, and national burden of traumatic brain injury and spinal cord injury, 1990-2016: A systematic analysis for the global burden of disease study 2016. Lancet Neurol 2019;18:56-87.  Back to cited text no. 9
    
10.
Ackery A, Tator C, Krassioukov A. A global perspective on spinal cord injury epidemiology. J Neurotrauma 2004;21:1355-70.  Back to cited text no. 10
    
11.
Agarwal P, Upadhyay P, Raja K. A demographic profile of traumatic and non-traumatic spinal injury cases: A hospital-based study from India. Spinal Cord 2007;45:597-602.  Back to cited text no. 11
    
12.
Sridharan N, Uvaraj N, Dhanagopal M, Gopinath N, Anuswedha A. Epidemiologic evidence of spinal cord injury in Tamil Nadu, India. Int J Res Med Sci 2015;1.  Back to cited text no. 12
    
13.
Mathur N, Jain S, Kumar N, Srivastava A, Purohit N, Patni A. Spinal cord injury: Scenario in an Indian state. Spinal Cord 2015;53:349-52.  Back to cited text no. 13
    
14.
Birua GJ, Munda VS, Murmu NN. Epidemiology of spinal injury in North East India: A retrospective study. Asian J Neurosurg 2018;13:1084-6.  Back to cited text no. 14
[PUBMED]  [Full text]  
15.
Rastogi D, Meena S, Sharma V, Singh GK. Epidemiology of patients admitted to a major trauma centre in northern India. Chin J Traumatol 2014;17:5.  Back to cited text no. 15
    
16.
Krassioukov AV, Furlan JC, Fehlings MG. Medical co-morbidities, secondary complications, and mortality in elderly with acute spinal cord injury. J Neurotrauma 2003;20:391-9.  Back to cited text no. 16
    
17.
Barman A, Shanmugasundaram D, Bhide R, Viswanathan A, Magimairaj HP, Nagarajan G, et al. Survival in persons with traumatic spinal cord injury receiving structured follow-up in south India. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2014;95:642-8.  Back to cited text no. 17
    
18.
Burns AS, O'Connell C. The challenge of spinal cord injury care in the developing world. J Spinal Cord Med 2012;35:3-8.  Back to cited text no. 18
    
19.
Badhiwala JH, Wilson JR, Fehlings MG. Global burden of traumatic brain and spinal cord injury. Lancet Neurol 2019;18:24-5.  Back to cited text no. 19
    
20.
Mahooti F, Raheb G, Alipour F, Hatamizadeh N. Psychosocial challenges of social reintegration for people with spinal cord injury: A qualitative study. Spinal Cord 2020;58:1119-27.  Back to cited text no. 20
    
21.
Kennedy P, Gorsuch N, Marsh N. Childhood onset of spinal cord injury: Self-esteem and self-perception. Br J Clin Psychol 1995;34:581-8.  Back to cited text no. 21
    
22.
Aleem IS, DeMarco D, Drew B, Sancheti P, Shetty V, Dhillon M, et al. The burden of spine fractures in India: A prospective multicenter study. Global Spine J 2017;7:325-33.  Back to cited text no. 22
    
23.
Zürcher C, Tough H, Fekete C; SwiSCI Study Group. Mental health in individuals with spinal cord injury: The role of socioeconomic conditions and social relationships. PLoS One 2019;14:e0206069.  Back to cited text no. 23
    
24.
Tate DG, Kalpakjian CZ, Forchheimer MB. Quality of life issues in individuals with spinal cord injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2002;83:S18-25.  Back to cited text no. 24
    
25.
Scholten EW, Tromp ME, Hillebregt CF, de Groot S, Ketelaar M, Visser-Meily JM, et al. Mental health and life satisfaction of individuals with spinal cord injury and their partners 5 years after discharge from first inpatient rehabilitation. Spinal Cord 2018;56:598-606.  Back to cited text no. 25
    
26.
Craig AR, Hancock KM, Dickson H, Martin J, Chang E. Psychological consequences of spinal injury: A review of the literature. Aust N Z J Psychiatry 1990;24:418-25.  Back to cited text no. 26
    
27.
Chhabra HS, Arora M. Demographic profile of traumatic spinal cord injuries admitted at Indian spinal injuries centre with special emphasis on mode of injury: A retrospective study. Spinal Cord 2012;50:745-54.  Back to cited text no. 27
    
28.
Equebal A, Anwer S, Kumar R. The prevalence and impact of age and gender on rehabilitation outcomes in spinal cord injury in India: A retrospective pilot study. Spinal Cord 2013;51:409-12.  Back to cited text no. 28
    
29.
Ramakrishnan K, Johnston D, Garth B, Murphy G, Middleton J, Cameron I. Early access to vocational rehabilitation for inpatients with spinal cord injury: A qualitative study of patients' perceptions. Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil 2016;22:183-91.  Back to cited text no. 29
    
30.
Geyh S, Nick E, Stirnimann D, Ehrat S, Michel F, Peter C, et al. Self-efficacy and self-esteem as predictors of participation in spinal cord injury – An ICF-based study. Spinal Cord 2012;50:699-706.  Back to cited text no. 30
    
31.
Krause JS, Kewman D, DeVivo MJ, Maynard F, Coker J, Roach MJ, et al. Employment after spinal cord injury: An analysis of cases from the model spinal cord injury systems. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1999;80:1492-500.  Back to cited text no. 31
    
32.
Athanasou JA, Brown DJ, Murphy GC. Vocational achievements following spinal cord injury in Australia. Disabil Rehabil 1996;18:191-6.  Back to cited text no. 32
    
33.
Poppen M. Vocational rehabilitation: Predicting employment outcomes for young adults with disabilities. 2016;34;14-22.  Back to cited text no. 33
    
34.
Middleton JW, Johnston D, Murphy G, Ramakrishnan K, Savage N, Harper R, et al. Early access to vocational rehabilitation for spinal cord injury inpatients. J Rehabil Med 2015;47:626-31.  Back to cited text no. 34
    
35.
Bozzacco V. Long-term psychosocial effects of spinal cord injury. Rehabil Nurs 1993;18:82-7.  Back to cited text no. 35
    
36.
Singh R, Sharma SC, Mittal R, Sharma A. Traumatic spinal cord injuries in Haryana: An epidemiological study. Indian journal of community medicine 2003;28:10.  Back to cited text no. 36
    
37.
Rahimi-Movaghar V, Sayyah MK, Akbari H, Khorramirouz R, Rasouli MR, Moradi-Lakeh M, et al. Epidemiology of traumatic spinal cord injury in developing countries: A systematic review. Neuroepidemiology 2013;41:65-85.  Back to cited text no. 37
    
38.
Migliorini C, Tonge B, Taleporos G. Spinal cord injury and mental health. Aust N Z J Psychiatry 2008;42:309-14.  Back to cited text no. 38
    
39.
Adhikari SP, Gurung G, Khadka B, Rana C. Factors influencing depression in individuals with traumatic spinal cord injury and caregivers' perceived burden in a low-income country: A cross-sectional study. Spinal Cord 2020;58:1112-8.  Back to cited text no. 39
    
40.
Kelly EH, Anderson CJ, Garma SI, Russell HF, Klaas SJ, Gorzkowski JA, et al. Relationships between the psychological characteristics of youth with spinal cord injury and their primary caregivers. Spinal Cord 2011;49:200-5.  Back to cited text no. 40
    
41.
Kraft R, Dorstyn D. Psychosocial correlates of depression following spinal injury: A systematic review. J Spinal Cord Med 2015;38:571-83.  Back to cited text no. 41
    
42.
Kalpakjian CZ, Albright KJ. An examination of depression through the lens of spinal cord injury. Womens Health Issues 2006;16:380-8.  Back to cited text no. 42
    
43.
Manigandan C, Saravanan B, Macaden A, Gopalan L, Tharion G, Bhattacharji S. Psychological wellbeing among carers of people with spinal cord injury: A preliminary investigation from South India. Spinal Cord 2000;38:559-62.  Back to cited text no. 43
    
44.
Srinivasan US. Acute spinal cord injury: Managing at the site of impact and addressing reality gap. J Assoc Physicians India 2012;60 Suppl:4.  Back to cited text no. 44
    
45.
Nicholls E, Lehan T, Plaza SL, Deng X, Romero JL, Pizarro JA, et al. Factors influencing acceptance of disability in individuals with spinal cord injury in Neiva, Colombia, South America. Disabil Rehabil 2012;34:1082-8.  Back to cited text no. 45
    
46.
Chlan KM, Zebracki K, Vogel LC. Spirituality and life satisfaction in adults with pediatric-onset spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord 2011;49:371-5.  Back to cited text no. 46
    
47.
Zeinali A, Mellat A, Rahimdel A, Alahsab A. A study on demographic pattern, causes and level of lesion in the spinal cord injured patients in Yazd City in 2009-2015. International Journal of Medical Research & Health Sciences 2016;5:447-51.  Back to cited text no. 47
    
48.
Tyroch AH, Davis JW, Kaups KL, Lorenzo M. Spinal cord injury. A preventable public burden. Arch Surg 1997;132:778-81.  Back to cited text no. 48
    
49.
Secinti E, Yavuz HM, Selcuk B. Feelings of burden among family caregivers of people with spinal cord injury in Turkey. Spinal Cord 2017;55:782-7.  Back to cited text no. 49
    
50.
Steinglass P, Temple S, Lisman SA, Reiss D. Coping with spinal cord injury: The family perspective. Gen Hosp Psychiatry 1982;4:259-64.  Back to cited text no. 50
    
51.
Talbot HS. The holistic approach to spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord 1979;17:32-5.  Back to cited text no. 51
    




 

Top
 
 
  Search
 
Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
Access Statistics
Email Alert *
Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)

 
  In this article
Abstract
Introduction
Methods
Discussion
Conclusion
References

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed858    
    Printed40    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded96    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal


[TAG2]
[TAG3]
[TAG4]